Subpart A—Purpose and Authority

§ 52.1 Purpose.

This part establishes the procedure for application for correction of military records of the Coast Guard, for consideration of applications by the Department of Homeland Security Board for Correction of Military Records of the Coast Guard (hereinafter “the Board”), and for settling claims or determining monetary benefits.

[OST Doc. No. 2002–13439, 68 FR 9886, Mar. 3, 2003, as amended by USCG–2003–15404, 68 FR 37740, June 25, 2003]

§ 52.2 Authority.

(a) The Secretary of Homeland Security, acting through boards of civilians, is authorized to correct any military record of the Coast Guard when the Secretary considers it necessary to correct an error or remove an injustice. 10 U.S.C. 1552. The Secretary shall ensure that final action on a complete application for correction is taken within 10 months of its receipt. (14 U.S.C. 2507)

*** In the history of DHS, the Secretary has never been involved in, or made aware of a BCMR Applicant, an Application, a Decision, a Correction or a Denial. It is highly unlikely that the Secretary could tell you what the abbreviation “BCMR” represents.

Subpart B—Establishment, Function, and Jurisdiction of Board

§ 52.11 Establishment and composition.

(a) Pursuant to 10 U.S.C. 1552, the Board for Correction of Military Records of the Coast Guard is established in the Office of the Secretary of Homeland Security.

(b) The Secretary appoints a panel of civilian officers or employees of the Department of Homeland Security to serve as members of the Board, and designates one such member to serve as Chair of the Board. The Chair designates members from this panel to serve as the Board for each case requiring consideration by a Board. The Board consists of three members, and two members present constitute a quorum of the Board.

(c) The Deputy Chair of the Board exercises the functions prescribed by these regulations and such other duties as may be assigned by the Chair.

[OST Doc. No. 2002–13439, 68 FR 9886, Mar. 3, 2003, as amended by USCG–2003–15404, 68 FR 37740, June 25, 2003]

*** The Secretary does not appoint a panel of civilians to serve as members of the Board. The Chair of the Board is obstensibly “officially” appointed by the DHS General Counsel and the position is considered a part-time collateral duty only. In fact, aware of the complete lack of importance given to this function by both DHS and the Coast Guard. a low-level functionary in the front office of the the General Counsel chooses an individual to “chair” the board. This Chair periodically designates three “available” staff from the 3,500 lawyers in the Office of the General Counsel to serve on the Board, a duty that no one wants and everyone dodges. There is no Deputy Chair.

§ 52.12 Function.

The function of the Board is to consider all applications properly before it, together with all pertinent military records and any submission received from the Coast Guard or other Government office under subpart E, to determine:

(a) Whether an error has been made in the applicant's Coast Guard military record, whether the applicant has suffered an error or injustice as the result of an omission or commission in his or her record, or whether the applicant has suffered some manifest injustice in the treatment accorded him or her; and

(b) Whether the Board finds it necessary to change a military record to correct an error or remove an injustice.

*** The BCMR’s function stated above is false. The board is prevented from properly considering a BCMR Application by their policy of presumed propriety on the part of the Coast Guard. Saddled with that severe constraint, the BCMR assumes everything the Coast Guard did to prompt the Applicant’s appeal was just and proper. As a result, the Board’s “decisions” always side with the Coast Guard; thereby negating the justification for a BCMR to exist.

§ 52.13 Jurisdiction.

(a) The Board has jurisdiction to review and determine all matters properly brought before it, consistent with existing law and such directives as may be issued by the Secretary.

(b) No application shall be considered by the Board until the applicant has exhausted all effective administrative remedies afforded under existing law or regulations, and such legal remedies as the Board may determine are practical, appropriate, and available to the applicant.

*** There is just one “administrative remedy” available to a BCMR Applicant before appealing a discharge to the Board: The Coast Guard’s laughably incompetent Discharge Review Board (DRB). If the DRB was capable of doing their job properly, the BCMR would have no Applications whatsoever. But, as instituted in the Coast Guard, the DRB is simply a rubber stamp wielded by Coast Guard ( CG-1) Human Resouces leadership to cover-up for incompetent Coast Guard Commanding Officers’ administrative discharge errors .

§ 52.21 General requirements.

(a) An application for correction of a Coast Guard record shall be submitted on DD Form 149 (Application for Correction of Military or Naval Record) or an exact copy thereof, and shall be addressed to: DHS Office of the General Counsel, Board for Correction of Military Records, 2707 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE, Stop 0485, Washington, DC 20528–0485. Forms and explanatory material may be obtained from the Chair of the Board.

(b) The application shall be signed by the person alleging error or injustice in his or her military record, except that an application may be signed by a family member or legal representative with respect to the record of a deceased, incapacitated, or missing person. The family member or legal representative must submit proof of his or her proper interest with the application.

(c) No application shall be docketed or processed until it is complete. An application for relief is complete when all of the following have been received by the Board:

(1) A signed DD Form 149, providing all necessary responses, including a specific allegation of error or injustice, accompanied by substantial evidence or information in support of such allegation;

(2) The military records of the applicant; and

(3) Any applicable military and Department of Veterans Affairs medical records.

(d) It is the applicant's responsibility to include his or her correct mailing address on the DD Form 149 and to inform the Chair in writing of any subsequent change of address until the Board or the Secretary takes final action on the application.

(e) Briefs in support of applications must be assembled in a manner that permits easy reproduction and may not exceed twenty-five double-spaced typewritten pages in a type size with no more than twelve characters per inch. This limitation does not apply to supporting documentary evidence. In complex cases, the Chair may waive this limitation.

[OST Doc. No. 2002–13439, 68 FR 9886, Mar. 3, 2003, as amended by USCG–2014–0410, 79 FR 38431, July 7, 2014; USCG-2019-0929, 84 FR 68343, Dec. 16, 2019]

*** Per sub-paragraph (c), although a pre-requisite for docketing a BCMR case, the Coast Guard often either can’t or chooses not to provide a complete copy of the Applicant’s military record.

§ 52.23 Counsel.

(a) Applicants may be represented by counsel at their own expense. Applicants whose cases are processed under the Whistleblower Protection Act and who are granted a hearing by the Board may be entitled to representation by a Coast Guard law specialist. 10 U.S.C. 1034(f)(3)(A).

(b) As used in this part, the term “counsel” includes attorneys who are members in good standing of any bar; accredited representatives of veterans' organizations recognized by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs pursuant to 38 U.S.C. 5902; and other persons who, in the opinion of the Chair, are competent to represent the applicant for correction. Whenever the term “applicant” is used in these rules, except in § 52.21(c), the term shall mean an applicant or his or her counsel.

*** Per sub-paragarph (a), If you engage a lawyer, which will cost you somewhere in the range of $15-30,000, do so only if you believe:

a. It’s worth it; and b. You have a chance of winning. (It’s not, and you don’t.)

The DHS Office of the Inspector General’s Whistleblower Protection Unit (WPU) - consisting of three lawyers - is completely disinterested in involving themselves in Coast Guard affairs. The Coast Guard, for its part, only recently corrected their longstanding “U.S. Coast Guard Civil Rights Manual” guidance that all individuals who believe they may have been victims of a whistleblower retaliation may file a complaint with the U.S. Office of Special Counsel, but made no mention of the DHS OIG Whistleblower Protection Unit; even though, the U.S. Office of Special Counsel never did, and does not currently have jurisdiction over the whistleblower retaliation complaints of military members.

§ 52.24 Evidence and burden of proof.

(a) It is the responsibility of the applicant to procure and submit with his or her application such evidence, including official records, as the applicant desires to present in support of his or her case. All such evidence should be submitted with the applicant's DD Form 149 in accordance with § 52.21(c)(1). Evidence submitted by an applicant after an application has been filed and docketed shall be considered late and its acceptance is subject to the provisions in § 52.26(a)(4) and (c).

(b) The Board begins its consideration of each case presuming administrative regularity on the part of Coast Guard and other Government officials. The applicant has the burden of proving the existence of an error or injustice by the preponderance of the evidence.

*** Per sub-paragraph (a), although one would be better served not to bother, you are all but forced to submit what shards of evidence you may gather in an environment of obfuscation and non-cooperation on the part of the Coast Guard. It won’t make any difference however, as the BCMR will ingore it, referring to any assertion or evidence of wrong-doing on the Coast Guard’s part as “alleged”.

Per sub-paragraph (b) and as noted several times elsewhere on this website, the absolute presumption of propriety on the part of Coast Guard military and civilian personnel directly equates to a presumption of guilt on the Applicant’s part no matter how much evidence, testimony or documentation there is to the contrary. The BCMR is “rigged” and you cannot and will not win.

§ 52.25 Access to official records.

The applicant shall have such access to official records or to any information pertaining to the applicant which is in the custody of the Coast Guard as is provided in 49 CFR parts 7 and 10.

*** Neither the Coast Guard nor the BCMR comply with this paragraph of U.S. Code, or the legal protections as codified in the Constitution of the United States. The Coast Guard will withold from the Applicant any document or evidence they consider to be detrimental to their case . (It is nearly impossible to counter evidence one has not seen.) In the case of documentation (e.g. E-mails), they will blatantly destroy it and then deny it ever existed. The DHS BCMR follows the Coast Guard’s example, refusing to provide any evidentiary documentation that might undermine the Coast Guard’s position. Both of these agency actions are taken with the direct knowledge and possible guidance of the UCSG Judge Advocate General’s office.

§ 52.26 Right to timely decision; effect of requests for extensions, changes in requests for relief, and late submissions of evidence.

(a) Each applicant has a right to have final action taken on his or her application within 10 months after all the elements of a complete application, as defined in § 52.21(c), have been received by the Board, unless the applicant:

(1) Submits a written request, which is granted by the Chair, for an extension of a specific duration to seek counsel or additional evidence;

(2) Submits a written request, which is granted by the Chair, for an extension of the time provided for responding to the views of the Coast Guard in accordance with § 52.42(d);

(3) Submits a signed statement that is determined by the Chair to significantly amend the applicant's request for relief after the application has been docketed;

(4) Submits significant new evidence, as determined by the Chair, after the application has been docketed; or

(5) Is found by the Chair to have unreasonably delayed responding to a request for further information or evidence.

(b) If the applicant requests an extension in accordance with paragraphs (a)(1) or (a)(2) of this section or unreasonably delays responding to a request for further information or evidence in accordance with paragraph (a)(5) of this section, he or she shall have a right to have final action taken on the application for correction within 10 months of the application's completion plus all periods of extension granted to the applicant by the Chair and all periods of unreasonable delay.

(c) If the applicant significantly amends his or her request for relief or submits significant new evidence after the application has been docketed, in accordance with paragraphs (a)(3) or (a)(4) of this section, the application shall be considered newly complete as of the date the amended request for relief or new evidence is received, in which case the applicant shall have a right to have final action taken on the application within 10 months of the date the Board receives the amended request for relief or significant new evidence.

*** Per sub-paragraph (a) and as mentioned elsewhere in these comments, the BCMR does not adhere to the 10 month legal guidance. Rather, 18 months is the norm from the date of submission of a BCMR Appication for a Final Decision to be issued.

Subpart D—Consideration of Application and Administrative Closure

Subpart E—Submissions by the Coast Guard and Other Offices

§ 52.41 Assistance.

The Board may request such advice, opinion, assistance, or use of the facilities of any other bureau, board, or office of the Department of Transportation as the Board deems necessary.

*** In recent history, the BCMR has never requested any “advice, opinion or assistance” from any bureau, board, or office other than the U.S. Coast Guard; and those requests are largely focused on what the Final Decision should be; and how to word the document.

§ 52.42 Views of the Coast Guard.

(a) The Board shall transmit to the Commandant of the Coast Guard or his or her delegate a copy of each application for relief submitted and docketed under subpart C of this part, together with any briefs, memoranda, and documentary evidence submitted or obtained in the case.

(b) The Commandant of the Coast Guard or his or her delegate may forward to the Board a written advisory opinion presenting the views of the Coast Guard on any case before the Board.

(c) An advisory opinion furnished by the Coast Guard under this section shall not be binding upon the Board, but shall be considered by the Board, along with all other information and material submitted in the particular case, if it is received by the Board within 135 days of the date the application is complete. The Chair may, in his or her discretion, grant the Coast Guard an extension of the time provided for submitting the advisory opinion.

(d) The Board shall promptly send a copy of each submission made by the Coast Guard under this section to the applicant involved, subject to the limitations in §§ 52.42(c) and 52.43(c). Each applicant has 30 days, from the date the Board sends the submission, to submit to the Board a written rebuttal or response to the Coast Guard's advisory opinion or a written request for an extension of the time to respond, subject to the provisions in § 52.26.

(e) Advisory opinions submitted by the Coast Guard and briefs submitted by applicants in response to the advisory opinions of the Coast Guard must be assembled in a manner that permits easy reproduction and may not exceed fifteen double-spaced typewritten pages in a type size with no more than twelve characters per inch. This limitation does not apply to supporting documentary evidence. In complex cases, the Chair may waive this limitation.

*** This paragraph addresses the USCG Judge Advocate General generated, and Human Resources (CG-1) / Personnel Service Center influenced “Advisory Opinion” (AO). The AO is, in effect, simply a draft of the BCMR Final Decsion prepared by a junior JAG attorney and passed to the unqualified paralegal who effectively runs the BCMR.

§ 52.43 Requests for further information; submissions of classified, privileged, and sensitive information.

(a) The Chair or the Board may ask the applicant to submit additional information not included in the application or response to the advisory opinion.

(b) The Chair or the Board may ask the Coast Guard or other Government office to submit any information, including reports of investigations, that the Chair or the Board deems relevant to an applicant's case.

(c) Whenever the Coast Guard or other Government office submits classified, privileged, or sensitive information to the Board in accordance with paragraph (b) of this section or § 52.42(b), it shall identify such information and also provide the Board with a copy of that part of the information that would be released to the applicant by the Coast Guard or other Government office if he or she requested it under 49 CFR parts 7 and 10. The Board shall forward only this redacted copy to the applicant.

*** The Chair of the Board will not ask you to submit anything other than a completed Application form. The more evidence of your assertions that you provide only increases their workload, forcing them to either ignore it (typically) or negate it with a outright lie (frequently).

Subpart F—Hearings

§ 52.53 Witnesses.

(a) In any case in which the Chair has granted a hearing, the applicant shall have the right to present witnesses.

(b) It is the responsibility of the applicant to notify his or her witnesses and to ensure their appearance at the date, time, and place set for the hearing.

*** Whether you physically present a witness or provide a witness’ affadavit, the board will ignore the “testimony” and act in favor of your Coast Guard accuser, who by the BCMR’s definition has more integrity and honor than you do. Of course, that’s not true but that is the Board’s overarching mandate.

§ 52.54 Expenses.

No expenses of any nature whatsoever incurred by an applicant, his or her counsel, witnesses, or others acting on behalf of the applicant shall be paid by the Government, except that an applicant may be entitled to representation by a Coast Guard law specialist if the case has been processed under the Whistleblower Protection Act. 10 U.S.C. 1034(f)(3)(A).

*** Again, if you engage a lawyer, which will cost you somewhere in the range of $15-30,000, do so only if you believe that it’s worth it and you have a chance of winning. And, it’s not, and you don’t.

Subpart G—Judgment and Disposition

§ 52.61 Deliberations and decision.

(a) The Board is convened at the call of the Chair and its meetings are recessed or adjourned by order of the Chair. Only members of the Board and its staff may be present during the deliberations of the Board. The Board's deliberations are conducted in executive session and are not reported.

(b) When the Board finds that the facts have not been fully and fairly disclosed by the records, testimony, and any other evidence before the Board, the Board may request the applicant and/or the Coast Guard to obtain and submit such further evidence as it considers essential to a complete and impartial understanding of the facts and issues.

(c) Following the receipt of all evidence, the Chair shall cause to be prepared and shall submit to the Board for its consideration a draft decision containing proposed findings and conclusions and a proposed order. A majority vote of the members of the Board present at a meeting on any matter relating to a draft decision before the Board shall constitute the action of the Board. If a draft decision is approved by the Board, it shall become a decision of the Board.

(d) The decision of the Board shall specify any change, correction, or modification of records to be made by the Coast Guard, and any other action deemed necessary to provide full and effective relief, which may include directing the Coast Guard to convene medical boards.

(e) If the Board deems it necessary to submit a comment or recommendation to the Secretary as to a matter arising from, but not directly related to, the issues in a case, it does so by separate communication.

*** As written, this paragraph is a complete fantasy. There is no meeting. The Application, the “draft” Final Decision document and on rare occasion, possibly some of the supporting documents are distributed to the three unlucky “board members” electronically. Without comment or any evidence that they’ve read any of the supporting documentation or even the “draft” Final Decision, the board members sign the Final Decision document electronically, taking as little as 10 minutes to fulfill their obligation “to consider all applications properly together with all pertinent military records and any submission received ” in order “to correct an error or remove an injustice before it”. The BCMR process, as practiced currently by DHS OGC, is a farce.

§ 52.62 Minority report.

In case of disagreement among Board members, a minority report may be submitted dissenting from or concurring with the decision of the Board.

*** This has NEVER happened; largely because the three board members simply sign where told following as little as a brief glance at a summary written by an unqualified paralegal without law enforcment or military experience.

§ 52.63 Record of proceedings.

(a) The Board shall prepare a complete record of each proceeding. The record shall include the application for relief; the written views of the Coast Guard, if any; any transcript of testimony; affidavits and documents considered by the Board; briefs and written arguments filed in the case; the findings, decisions, and recommendations of the Board; minority reports, if any; and all other materials necessary to reflect a true and complete history of the proceedings.

(b) After final action has been taken on an application in accordance with § 52.64, any classified, privileged, or sensitive information in the record of proceedings that has been provided by the Coast Guard or another Government office in accordance with §§ 52.42 or 52.43 shall be returned by the Board to the office from which it was received. Only a copy of the information provided by the Coast Guard or other Government office for release to the applicant in accordance with § 52.43(c) shall be retained in the permanent record of proceedings after final action is taken.

*** The BCMR will access and use information provided by the FBI’s N-DEx law enforcment database , the USCG Judge Advocate General, the USCG Police Department, the Coast Guard Investigative Service, your Commanding Officer and others that they will neither provide to you, nor permit you to access. Restated, you will not be allowed to see the so-called “evidence” against you, counter to your legal rights as detailed in the Constitution of the United States.

§ 52.64 Final action.

(a) The Board, provided that it acts unanimously, may take final action on behalf of the Secretary, pursuant to 10 U.S.C. 1552, as follows:

(1) The Board may deny an application for the correction of military records.

(2) Unless the Coast Guard, in submitting its views pursuant to § 52.42(b), identifies and describes a significant issue of Coast Guard policy challenged in the application, the Board may approve an application for the correction of military records in any of the following categories:

(i) An application to correct an enlistment or reenlistment contract or agreement to extend an enlistment for the purpose of effecting or increasing entitlement to a Selective Reenlistment Bonus;

(ii) An application to modify an election to participate in the Survivor Benefit Plan;

(iii) An application to change a reenlistment eligibility code;

(iv) An application to correct the character of, or reason for, a discharge or separation; or

(v) An application to receive a medal or award.

(3) The Board may approve any application for correction of military records not included in one of the categories in paragraph (a)(2) of this section, if the Coast Guard recommends the same or substantially same relief as that requested by the applicant.

(b) Except in cases where the Board takes final action under paragraph (a) of this section, the Board shall forward the record of its proceedings to the Secretary, who may approve, disapprove, or concur in the decision of the Board or the minority report, if any, either in whole or in part, and amend the order of the Board accordingly, or return the case to the Board for additional consideration. After taking final action, the Secretary shall send any such statement and the record of proceedings to the Board for disposition.

*** The ”Secretary” couldn’t tell you what BCMR means. And the DHS General Counsel would have to be reminded. Neither of these gentlemen has ever seen a BCMR Final Decision document.

§ 52.65 Orders.

(a) The Board shall issue such orders or directives as may be necessary to carry out a final action.

(b) The Board may ask the Coast Guard to submit a written report to the Board specifying the action taken and the date thereof with respect to any final action.

(c) Unless doing so is likely to nullify the relief granted, copies of the final decision shall be placed in the military record of the applicant.

*** Sub-paragraph (c) is only possible if the Coast Guard can find the Applicant’s military record. As the Coast Guard has twice transitioned to “electronic” service records in the past three years, there is little chance that they will be able to produce a complete personnel data record.

§ 52.66 Notification.

After final action is taken under § 52.64, the Board shall send a copy of the final decision to the applicant. The applicant may inspect the permanent record of proceedings at Board offices.

*** Despite what they “advertise”, from the submission of a BCMR Application to receipt of the BCMR Final Decision requires approximately two years.

§ 52.67 Reconsideration.

(a) Reconsideration of an application for correction of a military record shall occur if an applicant requests it and the request meets the requirements set forth in paragraph (a)(1) or (a)(2) of this section.

(1) An applicant presents evidence or information that was not previously considered by the Board and that could result in a determination other than that originally made. Such new evidence or information may only be considered if it could not have been presented to the Board prior to its original determination if the applicant had exercised reasonable diligence; or

(2) An applicant presents evidence or information that the Board, or the Secretary as the case may be, committed legal or factual error in the original determination that could have resulted in a determination other than that originally made.

(b) The Chair shall docket a request for reconsideration of a final decision if it meets the requirements of paragraph (a)(1) or (a)(2) of this section. If neither of these requirements is met, the Chair shall not docket such request.

(c) The Board shall consider each application for reconsideration that has been docketed. None of the Board members who served on the Board that considered an applicant's original application for correction shall serve on the Board that decides the applicant's application upon reconsideration.

(d) Action by the Board on a docketed application for reconsideration is subject to §§ 52.26 and 52.64(b).

(e) An applicant's request for reconsideration must be filed within two years after the issuance of a final decision, except as otherwise required by law. If the Chair dockets an applicant's request for reconsideration, the two-year requirement may be waived if the Board finds that it would be in the interest of justice to consider the request despite its untimeliness.

*** You application will only be reconsidered if you can prevent “new evidence”. However, if the Application was prepared properly, the only “new evidence” potentially available will be the evidentiary material the Coast Guard has either destroyed or refused to provide the Applicant. Thus, in the past 10 years, there have been no BCMR “reconsiderations”.

Subpart H—Payment of Claims and Implementation of Orders

§ 52.73 Interpretation.

If the intent or import of the final decision is not clear to the Coast Guard, if the Coast Guard believes that executing all or part of the order in the final decision is beyond the Coast Guard's authority, or if the Coast Guard believes that the order is incomplete because of an oversight, the final decision shall be returned to the Board for clarification or technical amendment.

*** This has never happened as the Coast Guard, in effect, makes the “final decision”. Thus, there is little to no possibility that they would question their own desires and verbiage.

Subpart I—Public Access to Decisions

§ 52.81 Reading room and index.

After deleting only so much personal information as is necessary to prevent an unwarranted invasion of privacy of the applicant or other persons mentioned in the final decision of the Board, a redacted copy of each final decision shall be indexed by subject and made available for review and copying at a public reading room. Final decisions created on or after November 1, 1996, shall be made available by electronic means. 5 U.S.C. 552.

*** The lackadasical and unconcerned DHS OGC BCMR has not posted any final decision document newer than 2020!!!

Code of Federal Regulations (Title 33)

PART 52—BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS OF THE COAST GUARD

Authority: 10 U.S.C. 1552; 14 U.S.C. 501, 503; Department of Homeland Security Delegations No. 0160.1(II)(B)(1), 0170.1(II)(23).

Source: OST Doc. No. 2002–13439, 68 FR 9886, Mar. 3, 2003, unless otherwise noted.